Truth-as-Simulation: Towards a Coalgebraic Perspective on Logic and Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
Building on the work of L. Moss on coalgebraic logic, I study in a general setting a class of infinitary modal logics for F -coalgebras, designed to capture simulation and bisimulation. For a notion of coalgebraic simulation, I use the work of A. Thijs on modelling simulation in terms of relators Γ (extensions of SET -functors along some family of preoders): simulation is the analogue for relators of the notion of bisimulation for functors. I prove the logics introduced here can indeed capture coalgebraic simulation and bisimulation. Moreover, one can characterize any given coalgebra up to simulation (and, in certain conditions, up to bisimulation) by a single sentence. An interesting feature of this logics is that their notion of truth or satisfaction can be understood as a simulation relation itself, but with respect to a (relator associated to a) richer functor F ; moreover, truth is the the largest simulation, i.e. the similarity relation between states of the coalgebra and elements of the language. This sheds a new perspective on the classical preservation and characterizability results, and also on logic games. The two kinds of games normally used in logic (“truth games” to define the semantics dynamically, and “similarity games” between two structures) are seen to be the same kind of game at the level of coalgebras: simulation games. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: 03G30, 03G99, 03B45, 03B70, 03C05, 18A15 1991 ACM Computing Classification System: F.4.1, F.3.2, I.6.1
منابع مشابه
Towards Coalgebraic Specification of Rewriting Theories
We describe a coalgebraic perspective on models of rewriting logic theories. After establishing a soundness and completeness result, we show how one can use modal logics for coalgebras to reason about the rewrite process. The approach is semantics-driven in the sense that the logic we propose is tailored to the class of models we consider.
متن کاملOn Logics for Coalgebraic Simulation
We investigate logics for coalgebraic simulation from a compositional perspective. Specifically, we show that the expressiveness of an inductively-defined language for coalgebras w.r.t. a given notion of simulation comes as a consequence of an expressivity condition between the language constructor used to define the language for coalgebras, and the relator used to define the notion of simulati...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملMonotonic Modal Logics
Monotonic modal logics form a generalisation of normal modal logics in which the additivity of the diamond modality has been weakened to monotonicity: 3p∨3q → 3(p∨q). This generalisation means that Kripke structures no longer form an adequate semantics. Instead monotonic modal logics are interpreted over monotonic neighbourhood structures, that is, neighbourhood structures where the neighbourho...
متن کاملBisimulation Games on Coalgebras
The theory of coalgebras [9] knows several ways to define behavioural equivalence or bisimilarity [11]. Another, complementary, view is to characterize behavioural equivalence via a coalgebraic modal logic [10, 8]. In concurrency theory a third perspective is quite common, where behavioural equivalence is defined via attacker-defender games [12]. Such games are useful both for theoretical reaso...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999